Breakeven Calculations
31 Jul 2010 Leave a Comment
in Surviving the Recession Tags: breakeven calculation, Contribution margin, profit margins, variable costs
Each individual product sale can be thought of as a contribution to to the task of making an overall profit for the business, assuming that the cost of producing (or buying) the product is less than its selling price. But merely producing a product (for example at a cost of $5. and selling it for $10 does not ensure a profit for the business. Why is this?
How Important is breakeven analysis in operating profitably?
31 Jul 2010 Leave a Comment
in Uncategorized Tags: breakeven analytics, cost management, start up business profits, volume projections and profits
It is the most important and significant first step in operating profitably. Whether as a start up or an established business, knowing what level of volume you have to reach in order to generate a profit is crucial. Watch for more posts on how to prepare and manage a break even analysis of your business.
WORKING ‘IN’ THE BUSINESS OR ‘ON’ THE BUSINESS?
05 Jul 2010 Leave a Comment
in Uncategorized Tags: quality, ratio budgeting, sustainability, working 'on' the business
Do you work ‘in’ your business of ‘on’ your business? Managers working ‘in’ the business are busy all the time, with handling crises, desperately trying to keep the business afloat in hard times, handling delivery delays, canceled orders, and other problems.
What then is working ‘on’ the business? Here are some ideas: take time to plan for cutting costs as revenue declines through ratio budgeting, concentrate your efforts where they can pay off, using the 80X20 rule (otherwise known as the Pareto law), compete on quality, sustainability, and service, not on price.
There are other programs as well that we have developed for small business.
Call for further information.
301-462-9850
Built to Change, A New Idea
10 Sep 2009 Leave a Comment
in Uncategorized Tags: Change Management, Creating Value, Org Design, Strategizing
THE BUILT TO CHANGE MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
By Richard Walton
September, 2009
I recently attended a conference at the Cape Cod Institute. The title of the presentation was ‘Built to Change, A New Model of Organizational Effectiveness’. The central thesis of the program was that in order to be effective today, we must abandon the old model of organizing for stability in favor of the new model of organizing for change. The key principles of the model are strategizing, designing, and creating value. I will explain each point below.
Strategizing is the process of deciding what products and markets the firm will serve. The model differs from past practice in that it suggests that the real need is for temporary competitive advantage, not permanent advantage. The reasons for this are obvious: In a environment of continuous change, no advantage can be permanent. Therefore it is much better to search for temporary advantage and be prepared to develop new products and services to meet new opportunities as they emerge, rather than spend organization resources defending a position that is constantly being undermined by the forces of change. In other words, embrace change rather than fight it.
Designing is the process of developing structures to compete effectively in the present as well as the future. Designing a structure for change is one in which change is considered the norm, rather than a temporary disruption to ‘the way we do things around here’. Among other things, this requires job descriptions to be flexible and broad, rather than narrow and rigid. Employees who interact with the external environment and gain new skills thereby should be considered a major organizational asset, and be rewarded accordingly.
Creating value is the third major principle of the new model. It is built upon the combined impact of organizational competencies and capabilities. Competencies are based in science, technology and engineering. Capabilities are based in processes, routines, behaviors and systems. It is the combination of the two that results in the creation of value through leveraging both to create customer perceived value. This can only be done by developing the capability to respond to changes in the outside environment, and leveraging organizational competencies to create and deliver value to customers when, where, and how it is needed.
The ‘Built to Change’ model of organizational effectiveness is ideally suited to the environments we are experiencing today: severe economic reversals, political instability, constant and rapid change, and newly emerging pressures to ‘go green’ and conduct business in an ethical and socially responsible manner. Adaptation to change is the key to survival now and success later, using the principles of strategic alignment, design for change, and value creation through the building and deployment of personal and organizational competencies and capabilities.
MPROVING PRODUCTIVITY AND LOWERING COSTS
24 Jul 2009 Leave a Comment
in Uncategorized Tags: entrepreneurship, improve productivity, lower costs, process flow diagramming, Product P&L, project management
IMPROVING PRODUCTIVITY AND LOWERING COSTS
A THREE STEP PROCESS TO
BEATING THE RECESSION AND PREPARING FOR THE UPTURN
By Richard Walton
July, 2009
We hear a lot these days about the double whammy of upward pressure on costs coupled with downward pressure on prices. It should be just the opposite, and it can be if the three step process we outline here is followed.
STEP 1, THE BASICS
COMPARE STANDARD COSTS TO ACTUAL RESULTS
The first step is a very basic look at costs, using what we have developed as a comparison of the financial results with a Product Profit and Loss Statement. The PP&L is compiled from the standard cost system and applies the standard costs to all products sold in the period covered by the regular Profit and Loss Statement. The two statements are then compared with the objective of using the standard costs (and selling prices) as what should have happened, and the actual results account for what did happen. If the actual volume for the period was lower than it should have been, then we have reason to believe that prices were reduced below standard. If the costs are higher than standard, this indicates either inaccuracies in cost computations, or inefficiency in the production process.
We then evaluate each individual order for differences both revenue earned and costs incurred. Using this bottom up approach, we can pinpoint products and customers where we are either making or losing money. Costs may need to be re calculated and prices adjusted accordingly. Products may need to be eliminated from the line. Production efficiency may need to be improved. Whatever needs to be done should be done to improve the relationship of actual results to standard costs, assuming of course that standard costs, and related breakeven points show that for a given level of volume, the firm will operate profitably.
STEP 2, THE INTERMEDIATE EFFORT
IMPROVE PRODUCTIVITY VIA PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAMMING
The second step is to view the entire process system, rather than individual products and services. The system includes marketing programs, sales solicitation, customer relationship management, customer service representative operations, inquiry generation and response, cost estimation, customer price quotations, order booking, materials control, plant staffing, production scheduling, quality control, logistics, shipping, billing, and collection processes, among others. We need to be effective in all of these operations, and process flow diagramming, that is developing a picture of how the processes work and interact is a starting point in improving operations by lowering costs and increasing output. Remember that it is not through increasing prices, particularly in a recession that profits are made. It is through lowering costs via productivity improvement, and increasing volume by increasing throughput.
STEP 3, THE ADVANCED PROCESS
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES, ACQUISITIONS, ENTREPRENEURSHIP
At this level we will begin to determine the future design of the firm, which assumes that we are operating profitably, and enjoying high growth rates and increasing market share. Capital expenditures must be considered as a means of stimulating further growth. At this point we should be gathering significant market intelligence, and preparing for major changes in both products and methods of production. This period may be called the great leap into the future, and it requires the highest level of talent and commitment from all concerned to successfully develop and implement plans. It is actually the process of organizational change that is in play at this stage. A key managerial tool at this stage of the process is Project Management, which will specify the goals, the timelines, the tasks, the budget, and the individuals who are responsible at each step of the way. Any major effort undertaken without this degree of control would be unlikely to have a successful outcome.
Changing markets and processes may require investments not only in new equipment but in companies as well either through merger of acquisition. This is a particularly important area to investigate in recessionary times, simply because other firms may be more vulnerable and therefore more open to being acquired. This period also requires a high degree of entrepreneurship in the structuring and operations of new businesses. It is a time for creativity and innovation, and while it is filled with potential risk, it is equally a time of great opportunity.
Small businesses particularly need to establish a method of standing above the day to day activity in order to view a changing landscape that both creates and destroys business value. Operating in the future, rather than in the past or even the present, will be the hallmark of success in this environment.
SUMMARY
We have presented here a basic, intermediate and advanced process of profit building theory and practice. At the basic level, we need to be in control of our costs and be able to predict and attain goals and objectives as well as operate profitably with good cost control. At the intermediate level, we are taking major steps to improve our productivity and throughput, in other words we are building a growing and profitable organization. We are building cost improvements through BPR and TQM, and improving throughput via systems management and Process Flow diagramming. Finally, at the advanced level, we are building the future organization via continuous improvement coupled with capital expenditures, acquisitions, and high level entrepreneurship. At this point, the landscape is wholly new and different, and the organization must be both capable of envisioning and implementing effective change processes.
HOW WELL DO YOU KNOW YOUR COSTS?
13 Jul 2009 2 Comments
in Uncategorized Tags: cost reduction, higher profits through lower prices, lower prices in recession, production efficiency
HOW WELL DO YOU KNOW YOUR COSTS
A QUICK QUIZ ON COST MANAGEMENT
By Richard Walton
7/09
In a recent meeting with a colleague, he mentioned that any firm that has been in business for 10 years knows its costs, inside and out. This led me to think that there may be some fundamental mis understandings about cost management, hence this quiz.
Answer yes or no to the questions below.
1. The cost of making products that have been produced for years is known to management.
2. Costs go up each year with the level of inflation.
3. The best action to take when costs go up is to raise prices accordingly.
4. Cutting prices reduces profit.
5. Customers will accept higher prices if they are told increases are caused by increased costs.
How did you answer these five questions? If you answered yes to all of them, you got them all wrong. The answer is no to each question, and here’s why.
1. No is the correct answer. The cost of making products varies by production efficiency. The variance is continuous and it affects gross profit margins on every production run. Total costs also vary accordingly to the level of overhead and gross sales. The lower the gross sales, the higher the total cost of products.
2. No is the correct answer. Costs go up is management does not focus on production efficiency and productivity. Costs should go down, and do go down when enough attention is placed on making the production process more efficient.
3. No is the correct answer. The best action to take is to reduce costs and prices as well, particularly in times of recession. This will provide an incentive to wary buyers and enable profits to be made due to lower costs.
4. No is the correct answer. Cutting prices when costs are reduced leads to higher volume and profit as customers take advantage of the lower prices.
5. No is the correct answer. Customers will seek the best value regardless of past purchasing behavior. Telling them that price increases are due to cost increases is a powerful incentive for them to search for more productive sources of supply, namely those firms with lower prices.
The quickest way to determine your production efficiency is to convert your P&L in dollars to a P&L in product terms, that is what volume of products produced the financial results. Applying the standard costs of production to the actual costs of production will give you a measure of efficiency. In order to reduce costs, improve efficiency.
More in our next article, in which we will discuss exactly how to do this.
HIRE COUNTER CYCLICALLY by Marty Mattare. Phd
04 Jun 2009 Leave a Comment
in Uncategorized Tags: strategic competitive advantage
New Rules: In Turbulent Times Hire Counter-Cyclically
for Strategic Competitive Advantage
It seems counter intuitive, but now is the time to hire top talent. Why — because you will take advantage of the great talent now available because of massive layoffs in the job market, talent that otherwise would possibly be unavailable to you. These talented people would ordinarily have many choices regarding job opportunities and often are lured by large organizations who offer advantageous opportunities. However, the job market is different now and will be for some time. That is your chance to employ super people who will play a major role in growing and improving your small business.
Because small companies feel the impact of personnel more deeply than larger ones who ‘absorb’ people into their systems, they need to think more strategically about human resources. Each person you hire will play a big role in the growth and development of that organization. Therefore, it is critical that you create a human capital growth management plan for your company.
Step 1: Evaluate the staff you currently have;
a) What are their credentials?
b) What related work experience do they have?
c) How does the compensation package hold up to the job market?
d) Where are the weaknesses – Finance? Marketing? Sales?
e) Write a job description that outlines what you need now.
f) Then, rewrite that job description for what you think you’ll need in 3 years; 5 years.
Step 2: Design your recruitment effort;
a) Where will you list the job opportunity?
b) Will you need a head hunter to help you pre-interview and screen applicants?
c) What are the screening criteria?
d) What is the compensation package? Use www.onet.org for job descriptions and salary ranges that are competitive.
e) What is the interview plan? Conduct yourself? Incorporate others for a multi rater approach?
f) What is your training plan? Small companies can cross-train quite effectively.
Step 3: Recruit and train;
a) Carefully conduct the recruiting process.
b) After the offer is made and accepted, start the training program. Be a mentor to your new employee!
Remember, when the job market turns around, the talented pool of potential employees will be snapped up the ‘the big guys!’
SUPER TOOLS IN SMALL BUSINESS MGT
03 Jun 2009 Leave a Comment
in Uncategorized Tags: breakeven analytics, continuous process improvement, ratio budgeting, sustainable competitive advantage
SUPER TOOLS FOR EFFECTIVE SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
BREAKEVEN ANALYTICS AND RATIO BUDGETING
By Richard Walton
5/09
In the midst of a recession, it is sometimes difficult to maintain a proactive perspective. We seem to be struggling constantly with issues of cash flow management as revenues decline, and the need to cut costs to maintain profitability. As a result, the longer term need to establish a sustainable competitive advantage is set aside while we fight the daily battles of survival.
It need not be this way. A much better alternative is to use the slow times to do some creative analytical work on the sales and cost data available through your accounting system. For a small investment in time and effort, it will be possible to see clearly where your major market strengths are, and focus your attention on building and maintaining them. There are two tools we will use in this exercise. They are: 1) Breakeven Analytics, and 2) Ratio Budgeting.
First, Breakeven Analytics. This tool requires the perspective of the whole system, in which the average gross profit margin is measured as the dollar contribution to pay administrative overhead. For example, if the GPM average is 40%, and the administrative overhead is $100,000 monthly, then .40 cents of every dollar of sales is available to pay overhead, which means that $250,000 in monthly sales (at the average GPM of 40%) will produce a contribution margin of $100,000 and thus the firm will break even. But since not all products will produce the same margin, we will need to develop BEA on the entire product line, so that we can identify the higher margin products.
To use this tool creatively, we need to focus our marketing efforts on high margin products and services on a consistent basis. The key is to constantly improve the value proposition offered to the customer through the product-service mix by a laser like focus on quality.
Second, Ratio Budgeting. This tool requires the perspective of the whole system, in which the costs of each element of production is measured as a percentage of total sales. The power of this approach can be shown by the calculations taken from a firm doing $5mm in business annually. If the labor costs are 25% of sales, and materials are 30%, then a 1% saving in labor will yield $12,500 annually, while a 1% reduction in materials costs will yield $15,000 annually.
To use this tool creatively, we need to focus our production management effort on continuous process improvement, which is another way of saying higher productivity and thereby lower costs. The key is to have a steadily decreasing cost of production as well as a steadily increasing value proposition for the customer. Thus, even n these times, we can have a sustainable competitive advantage through continuous process improvement
ENHANCE PROFITABILITY THROUGH RATIO BUDGETING
16 May 2009 Leave a Comment
in Uncategorized Tags: continuous process improvement, cost reduction, profitability
Every time you see a financial statement, it shows the relationship of costs to sales. When you deduct the costs of production from sales, you have the gross profit margin, which when expressed as a percentage, gives you the amount of money per unit ofsales left after production expenses which can be used to pay overhead costs.
If the gross margin is 40% (that is .40 cents per dollar of sales) then there are two things we can do to improve profitability.
One is to lower the cost of sales and therby raise the GPM. In a firm billing $1mm per year, 1% reuction saves $10,000 over the year. Thaht is worth pursuing, but do you know how to do it?
Surviving the Recession
05 May 2009 1 Comment
in Surviving the Recession, Uncategorized
Every business has been affected by the recession. Some have reacted effectively, others have not. One of the things I have noticed is that responding by reducing prices to meet competition, and across the board layoffs are two of the most used techniques and both are wrong.
What, then is the correct response? The answer is in two parts, the first is surviving the recession by developing and maintaining a sustainable competitive advantage. The second part is to create a system of continuous process improvement.
In later postings, I will show how these two parts come together and how they can be implemented.
Comments are welcome!